|
Noam Chomsky A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal
Behavior Language, 35, No. 1 (1959), 26-58. "From
this sample, it can be seen that the notion of reinforcement has totally lost
whatever objective meaning it may ever have had. Running through these examples,
we see that a person can be reinforced though he emits no response at all, and
that the reinforcing stimulus need not impinge on the reinforced person or need
not even exist (it is sufficient that it be imagined or hoped for). When we read
that a person plays what music he likes (165), says what he likes (165), thinks
what he likes (438-39), reads what books he likes (163), etc., BECAUSE he finds
it reinforcing to do so, or that we write books or inform others of facts BECAUSE
we are reinforced by what we hope will be the ultimate behavior of reader or listener,
we can only conclude that the term reinforcement has a purely ritual function.
The phrase "X is reinforced by Y (stimulus, state of affairs, event, etc.)"
is being used as a cover term for "X wants Y," "X likes Y,"
"X wishes that Y were the case," etc. Invoking the term reinforcement
has no explanatory force, and any idea that this paraphrase introduces any new
clarity or objectivity into the description of wishing, liking, etc., is a serious
delusion. The only effect is to obscure the important differences among the notions
being paraphrased." [Full
Text] Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What
is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive
salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998 Dec;28(3):309-69. "What
roles do mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine systems play in reward? Do they mediate
the hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli? Do they mediate hedonic reward learning
and associative prediction? Our review of the literature, together with results
of a new study of residual reward capacity after dopamine depletion, indicates
the answer to both questions is 'no'. Rather, dopamine systems may mediate the
incentive salience of rewards, modulating their motivational value in a manner
separable from hedonia and reward learning. In a study of the consequences of
dopamine loss, rats were depleted of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum
by up to 99% using 6-hydroxydopamine. In a series of experiments, we applied the
'taste reactivity' measure of affective reactions (gapes, etc.) to assess the
capacity of dopamine-depleted rats for: 1) normal affect (hedonic and aversive
reactions), 2) modulation of hedonic affect by associative learning (taste aversion
conditioning), and 3) hedonic enhancement of affect by non-dopaminergic pharmacological
manipulation of palatability (benzodiazepine administration). We found normal
hedonic reaction patterns to sucrose vs. quinine, normal learning of new hedonic
stimulus values (a change in palatability based on predictive relations), and
normal pharmacological hedonic enhancement of palatability. We discuss these results
in the context of hypotheses and data concerning the role of dopamine in reward.
We review neurochemical, electrophysiological, and other behavioral evidence.
We conclude that dopamine systems are not needed either to mediate the hedonic
pleasure of reinforcers or to mediate predictive associations involved in hedonic
reward learning. We conclude instead that dopamine may be more important to incentive
salience attributions to the neural representations of reward-related stimuli.
Incentive salience, we suggest, is a distinct component of motivation and reward.
In other words, dopamine systems are necessary for 'wanting' incentives, but not
for 'liking' them or for learning new 'likes' and 'dislikes'." [Abstract] Ahn,
Soyon, Phillips, Anthony G. Dopaminergic Correlates of Sensory-Specific
Satiety in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Nucleus Accumbens of the Rat J.
Neurosci. 1999 19: 29RC- "Changes in dopamine (DA) efflux in the medial
prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of rats were monitored using in vivo microdialysis
during sensory-specific satiety experiments. Rats consumed significant amounts
of a palatable food during an initial meal but ate little when the same food was
available as a second meal. In contrast, rats given a different palatable food
ate a significant quantity during the second meal. DA efflux in both brain regions
reflected this difference in food intake, indicating that DA activity is influenced
by changes in the deprivation state of animals and sensory incentive properties
of food. Given the proposed role of DA in motivated behaviors, these findings
suggest that DA efflux may signal the relative incentive salience of foods and
thus is a determinant of the pattern of food consumption observed in sensory-specific
satiety." [Full
Text] Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Telang F,
Maynard L, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Pappas N, Wong C, Vaska P, Zhu W, Swanson JM. Evidence
that methylphenidate enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing
dopamine in the human brain. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1173-80. "OBJECTIVE:
Methylphenidate is the most commonly prescribed drug for attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD), yet its therapeutic mechanisms are poorly understood. The objective
of this study was to assess if methylphenidate, by increasing dopamine (neurotransmitter
involved in motivation) in brain, would enhance the saliency of an academic task,
making it more interesting. METHOD: Healthy subjects (N=16) underwent positron
emission tomography with [(11)C]raclopride (dopamine D(2) receptor radioligand
that competes with endogenous dopamine for binding) to assess the effects of oral
methylphenidate (20 mg) on extracellular dopamine in the striatum. The authors
compared the effects of methylphenidate during an academic task (solving mathematical
problems with monetary reinforcement) and a neutral task (passively viewing cards
with no remuneration). In parallel, the effects of methylphenidate on the interest
that the academic task elicited were also evaluated. RESULTS: Methylphenidate,
when coupled with the mathematical task, significantly increased extracellular
dopamine, but this did not occur when coupled with the neutral task. The mathematical
task did not increase dopamine when coupled with placebo. Subjective reports about
interest and motivation in the mathematical task were greater with methylphenidate
than with placebo and were associated with dopamine increases. CONCLUSIONS: The
significant association between methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases and
the interest and motivation for the task confirms the prediction that methylphenidate
enhances the saliency of an event by increasing dopamine. The enhanced interest
for the task could increase attention and improve performance and could be one
of the mechanisms underlying methylphenidate's therapeutic effects. These findings
support educational strategies that make schoolwork more interesting as nonpharmacological
interventions to treat ADHD." [Abstract] Leyton
M, Boileau I, Benkelfat C, Diksic M, Baker G, Dagher A. Amphetamine-induced
increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C]raclopride
study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002 Dec;27(6):1027-35. "Eight
healthy men underwent two positron emission tomography (PET) [11C]raclopride scans,
one following placebo, the second following d-amphetamine (0.30 mg/kg, p.o.).
PET data were analyzed using: (1) brain parametric maps to statistically generate
regions of significant change; and (2) a priori identified regions of interest
(ROI) manually drawn on each individual's co-registered magnetic resonance (MR)
images. Compared with placebo, d-amphetamine decreased [11C]raclopride binding
potential (BP) with significant effects in ventral but not dorsal striatum. Change
in BP in the statistically generated cluster correlated with self-reported drug-induced
'drug wanting' (r = 0.83, p =.01) and the personality trait of Novelty Seeking-Exploratory
Excitability (r = 0.79, p =.02). The same associations were seen in the manually
drawn ROI in ventral striatum but not in dorsal putamen or caudate. Changes in
extracellular dopamine (DA) did not correlate with mood. Mesolimbic DA might mediate
interest in obtaining reward rather than reward, per se. Individual differences
in amphetamine-induced DA release might be related to predispositions to drug
and novelty seeking." [Abstract] de
la Fuente-Fernandez R, Phillips AG, Zamburlini M, Sossi V, Calne DB, Ruth TJ,
Stoessl AJ. Dopamine release in human ventral striatum and expectation
of reward. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Nov 15;136(2):359-63. "Using
the ability of [11C]raclopride to compete with dopamine for D(2)/D(3) receptors,
we investigated by positron emission tomography the effect of placebo (saline)
injection on dopamine release in the ventral striatum of patients with Parkinson's
disease. We found evidence for placebo-induced dopamine release of similar magnitude
to that reported in healthy volunteers after amphetamine administration. However,
in contrast to the dorsal striatum, there were no differences in [11C]raclopride
binding potential changes between patients who experienced the reward (those who
reported placebo-induced clinical benefit) and those who did not. We conclude
that the release of dopamine in the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) is related
to the expectation of reward and not to the reward itself. These observations
have potential implications for the treatment of drug addiction." [Abstract] Schmidt
K, Nolte-Zenker B, Patzer J, Bauer M, Schmidt LG, Heinz A. Psychopathological
correlates of reduced dopamine receptor sensitivity in depression, schizophrenia,
and opiate and alcohol dependence. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001
Mar;34(2):66-72. "A dysfunction of central dopaminergic neurotransmission
has been found in various neuropsychiatric diseases, and may be associated with
a common psychopathological correlate. One hypothesis suggests that dopaminergic
stimulation of the brain reward system reinforces behavior because it is experienced
as pleasurable, and that dopaminergic dysfunction leads to anhedonia, the inability
to experience pleasure. An alternative hypothesis assumes that dopaminergic stimulation
does not promote pleasure or "liking" of a reward but rather mediates
"wanting" of a reward, and suggests that dopaminergic dysfunction is
associated with a failure to be motivated by stimuli that indicate reward. We
measured negative symptoms, psychomotor slowing and dopamine receptor sensitivity
in twelve drug-free patients with major depression, seventeen alcohol-dependent
and sixteen opiate-dependent patients, ten schizophrenics with neuroleptic medication,
and ten healthy controls. The sensitivity of central dopamine receptors was assessed
with the growth hormone response to apomorphine application. Psychomotor slowing
was measured in a reaction-time test and anhedonia and other negative symptoms
were assessed with self-rating scales and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative
Symptoms. Patients with major depression, alcohol dependence and neuroleptic medication
displayed a reduced sensitivity of central dopamine receptors compared to control
subjects. Anhedonia was not a common correlate of dopamine receptor dysfunction.
Instead, affective flattening was associated with both dopamine receptor sensitivity
and psychomotor slowing. Our findings thus do not support the anhedonia hypothesis
of central dopaminergic dysfunction. Rather, affective flattening may result from
the lack of an emotional response towards reward-indicating stimuli. These findings
indicate that patients with dopaminergic dysfunction are not unable to experience
pleasure, but may fail to be motivated by environmental stimuli to seek reward."
[Abstract]
Salamone JD, Correa M. Motivational views of
reinforcement: implications for understanding the behavioral functions of nucleus
accumbens dopamine. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Dec 2;137(1-2):3-25. "Although
the Skinnerian 'Empirical Law of Effect' does not directly consider the fundamental
properties of stimuli that enable them to act as reinforcers, such considerations
are critical for determining if nucleus accumbens dopamine systems mediate reinforcement
processes. Researchers who have attempted to identify the critical characteristics
of reinforcing stimuli or activities have generally arrived at an emphasis upon
motivational factors. A thorough review of the behavioral literature indicates
that, across several different investigators offering a multitude of theoretical
approaches, motivation is seen by many as being fundamental to the process of
reinforcement. The reinforcer has been described as a goal, a commodity, an incentive,
or a stimulus that is being approached, self-administered, attained or preserved.
Reinforcers also have been described as activities that are preferred, deprived
or in some way being regulated. It is evident that this 'motivational' or 'regulatory'
view of reinforcement has had enormous influence over the hypothesis that DA directly
mediates 'reward' or 'reinforcement' processes. Indeed, proponents of the DA/reward
hypothesis regularly cite motivational theorists and employ their language. Nevertheless,
considerable evidence indicates that low/moderate doses of DA antagonists, and
depletions of DA in nucleus accumbens, can suppress instrumental responding for
food while, at the same time, these conditions leave fundamental aspects of reinforcement
(i.e. primary or unconditioned reinforcement; primary motivation or primary incentive
properties of natural reinforcers) intact. Several complex features of the literature
on dopaminergic involvement in reinforcement are examined below, and it is argued
that the assertions that DA mediates 'reward' or 'reinforcement' are inaccurate
and grossly oversimplified. Thus, it appears as though it is no longer tenable
to assert that drugs of abuse are simply turning on the brain's natural 'reward
system'. In relation to the hypothesis that DA systems are involved in 'wanting',
but not 'liking', it is suggested in the present review that 'wanting' has both
directional aspects (e.g. appetite to consume food) and activational aspects (e.g.
activation for initiating and sustaining instrumental actions; tendency to work
for food). The present paper reviews findings in support of the hypothesis that
low doses of DA antagonists and accumbens DA depletions do not impair appetite
to consume food, but do impair activational aspects of motivation. This suggestion
is consistent with the studies showing that low doses of DA antagonists and accumbens
DA depletions alter the relative allocation of instrumental responses, making
the animals less likely to engage in instrumental responses that have a high degree
of work-related response costs. In addition, this observation is consistent with
studies demonstrating that accumbens DA depletions make rats highly sensitive
to ratio requirements on operant schedules. Although accumbens DA is not seen
as directly mediating appetite to consume food, principles of behavioral economics
indicate that accumbens DA could be involved in the elasticity of demand for food
in terms of the tendency to pay work-related response costs. Future research must
focus upon how specific aspects of task requirements (i.e. ratio requirements,
intermittence of reinforcement, temporal features of response requirements, dependence
upon conditioned stimuli) interact with the effects of accumbens DA depletions,
and which particular factors determine sensitivity to the effects of DA antagonism
or depletion." [Abstract]
Robinson
TE, Berridge KC. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an
incentive-sensitization view. Addiction. 2000 Aug;95 Suppl
2:S91-117. "The question of addiction specifically concerns (1), the process
by which drug-taking behavior, in certain individuals, evolves into compulsive
patterns of drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior that take place at the expense
of most other activities and (2), the inability to cease drug-taking; the problem
of relapse. In this paper current biopsychological views of addiction are critically
evaluated in light of the "incentive-sensitization theory of addiction",
which we first proposed in 1993, and new developments in research are incorporated.
We argue that traditional negative reinforcement, positive reinforcement, and
hedonic accounts of addiction are neither necessary nor sufficient to account
for compulsive patterns of drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior. Four major tenets
of the incentive-sensitization view are discussed. These are: (1) Potentially
addictive drugs share the ability to produce long-lasting adaptations in neural
systems. (2) The brain systems that are changed include those normally involved
in the process of incentive motivation and reward. (3) The critical neuroadaptations
for addiction render these brain reward systems hypersensitive ("sensitized")
to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. (4) The brain systems that are sensitized
do not mediate the pleasurable or euphoric effects of drugs (drug "liking"),
but instead they mediate a subcomponent of reward we have termed incentive salience
(drug "wanting"). We also discuss the role that mesolimbic dopamine
systems play in reward, evidence that neural sensitization happens in humans,
and the implications of incentive-sensitization for the development of therapies
in the treatment of addiction." [Abstract] Berridge
KC. Pleasures of the brain. Brain Cogn. 2003
Jun;52(1):106-28. "How does the brain cause positive affective reactions
to sensory pleasure? An answer to pleasure causation requires knowing not only
which brain systems are activated by pleasant stimuli, but also which systems
actually cause their positive affective properties. This paper focuses on brain
causation of behavioral positive affective reactions to pleasant sensations, such
as sweet tastes. Its goal is to understand how brain systems generate 'liking,'
the core process that underlies sensory pleasure and causes positive affective
reactions. Evidence suggests activity in a subcortical network involving portions
of the nucleus accumbens shell, ventral pallidum, and brainstem causes 'liking'
and positive affective reactions to sweet tastes. Lesions of ventral pallidum
also impair normal sensory pleasure. Recent findings regarding this subcortical
network's causation of core 'liking' reactions help clarify how the essence of
a pleasure gloss gets added to mere sensation. The same subcortical 'liking' network,
via connection to brain systems involved in explicit cognitive representations,
may also in turn cause conscious experiences of sensory pleasure." [Abstract]
Reynolds,
Sheila M., Berridge, Kent C. Positive and Negative Motivation in
Nucleus Accumbens Shell: Bivalent Rostrocaudal Gradients for GABA-Elicited Eating,
Taste "Liking"/"Disliking" Reactions, Place Preference/Avoidance,
and Fear J. Neurosci. 2002 22: 7308-7320 "Microinjection
of the GABAA agonist muscimol in the rostral medial accumbens shell in rats elicits
appetitive eating behavior, but in the caudal shell instead elicits fearful defensive
treading behavior. To further test the hypothesis that rostral shell muscimol
microinjections produce positive motivational states, whereas caudal shell muscimol
produces negative states, we measured behavioral place preference/avoidance conditioning
and affective hedonic and aversive orofacial expressions of taste-elicited "liking"
and "disliking" (gapes, etc.) in addition to fear and feeding behaviors.
Farthest rostral muscimol microinjections (75 ng) caused increased eating behavior
and also caused positive conditioned place preferences and increased positive
hedonic reactions to the taste of sucrose. By contrast, caudal shell microinjections
elicited negative defensive treading and caused robust negative conditioned place
avoidance and negative aversive reactions to sucrose or quinine tastes. Intermediate
rostral microinjections elicited effects of mixed positive/negative valence (positive
appetitive eating behavior but negative place avoidance and negative taste reactions
at mid-rostral sites, and sometimes positive eating simultaneously with fearful
defensive treading more caudally). These results indicate that GABAergic neurotransmission
in local microcircuits in nucleus accumbens mediates motivated/affective behavior
that is bivalently organized along rostrocaudal gradients." [Abstract] Volkow
ND, Wang GJ, Maynard L, Jayne M, Fowler JS, Zhu W, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Ding YS,
Wong C, Pappas N. Brain dopamine is associated with eating behaviors
in humans. Int J Eat Disord. 2003 Mar;33(2):136-42. "OBJECTIVE:
Eating behavior in humans is influenced by variables other than just hunger-satiety
including cognitive restraint, emotional distress, and sensitivity to food stimuli.
We investigate the role of dopamine (DA), a neurotransmitter involved with food
motivation, in these variables. METHODS: We used the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire
(DEBQ) to measure Restraint, Emotionality, and Externality in 10 subjects. We
correlated DEBQ scores with brain DA levels. Positron emission tomography and
[(11)C]raclopride uptake were used to measure baseline D(2) receptors (neutral
stimulation) and to assess changes in extracellular DA to food stimulation (display
of food). RESULTS: Restraint was correlated with DA changes with food stimulation
(higher restraint, greater responsivity), emotionality was negatively correlated
with baseline D(2) receptors (higher emotionality, lower D(2) receptors), whereas
externality was not. These correlations were significant in the dorsal but not
in the ventral striatum. DISCUSSION: These results provide evidence that DA in
the dorsal striatum is involved with the restraint and emotionality components
regulating eating behavior and that these two dimensions reflect different neurobiologic
processes." [Abstract]
Goto,
Yukiori, O'Donnell, Patricio Synchronous Activity in the Hippocampus
and Nucleus Accumbens In Vivo J. Neurosci. 2001 21: 131-
"The hippocampus is one of the brain regions involved in cognitive functions,
including learning and memory. Extensive studies have unveiled how information
is processed within this system. However, the mechanisms by which hippocampal
activity is translated into action remain unsolved. One important target of hippocampal
projections is the nucleus accumbens, which has been described as the motivation-to-action
interface. Previous experiments indicate that these projections can control information
processing in this region by setting neurons into a depolarized state. Here, we
report that membrane potential transitions in nucleus accumbens neurons are correlated
with electrical activity in the ventral hippocampus, suggesting that hippocampal
neural activity can determine ensembles of active accumbens neurons." [Full
Text] Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, Kupfer
DJ, Kinahan PE, Grace AA, Price JL, Mathis CA. Amphetamine-induced
dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol
Psychiatry. 2001 Jan 15;49(2):81-96. "BACKGROUND: Studies in experimental
animals have implicated the mesolimbic dopaminergic projections into the ventral
striatum in the neural processes underlying behavioral reinforcement and motivated
behavior; however, understanding the relationship between subjective emotional
experience and ventral striatal dopamine (DA) release has awaited human studies.
Using positron emission tomography (PET), we correlated the change in endogenous
dopamine concentrations following dextroamphetamine (AMPH) administration with
the associated hedonic response in human subjects and compared the strength of
this correlation across striatal subregions. METHODS: We obtained PET measures
of [(11)C]raclopride specific binding to DA D2/D3 receptors before and after AMPH
injection (0.3 mg/kg IV) in seven healthy subjects. The change in [(11)C]raclopride
binding potential (DeltaBP) induced by AMPH pretreatment and the correlation between
DeltaBP and the euphoric response to AMPH were compared between the anteroventral
striatum (AVS; comprised of accumbens area, ventromedial caudate, and anteroventral
putamen) and the dorsal caudate (DCA) using an MRI-based region of interest analysis
of the PET data. RESULTS: The mean DeltaBP was greater in the AVS than in the
DCA (p <.05). The AMPH-induced changes in euphoria analog scale scores correlated
inversely with DeltaBP in the AVS (r = -.95; p <.001), but not in the DCA (r
=.30, ns). Post hoc assessments showed that changes in tension-anxiety ratings
correlated positively with DeltaBP in the AVS (r =.80; p [uncorrected] <.05)
and that similar relationships may exist between DeltaBP and emotion ratings in
the ventral putamen (as were found in the AVS). CONCLUSIONS: The preferential
sensitivity of the ventral striatum to the DA releasing effects of AMPH previously
demonstrated in experimental animals extends to humans. The magnitude of ventral
striatal DA release correlates positively with the hedonic response to AMPH."
[Abstract]
Michel Barrot, Jocelien D. A. Olivier, Linda I. Perrotti,
Ralph J. DiLeone, Olivier Berton, Amelia J. Eisch, Soren Impey, Daniel R. Storm,
Rachael L. Neve, Jerry C. Yin, Venetia Zachariou, and Eric J. Nestler CREB
activity in the nucleus accumbens shell controls gating of behavioral responses
to emotional stimuli PNAS 99: 11435-11440; published online
before print as 10.1073/pnas.172091899 "The transcription factor cAMP
response element (CRE)-binding protein (CREB) has been shown to regulate neural
plasticity. Drugs of abuse activate CREB in the nucleus accumbens, an important
part of the brain's reward pathways, and local manipulations of CREB activity
have been shown to affect cocaine reward, suggesting an active role of CREB in
adaptive processes that follow exposure to drugs of abuse. Using CRE-LacZ reporter
mice, we show that not only rewarding stimuli such as morphine, but also aversive
stimuli such as stress, activate CRE-mediated transcription in the nucleus accumbens
shell. Using viral-mediated gene transfer to locally alter the activity of CREB,
we show that this manipulation affects morphine reward, as well as the preference
for sucrose, a more natural reward. We then show that local changes in CREB activity
induce a more general syndrome, by altering reactions to anxiogenic, aversive,
and nociceptive stimuli as well. Increased CREB activity in the nucleus accumbens
shell decreases an animal's responses to each of these stimuli, whereas decreased
CREB activity induces an opposite phenotype. These results show that environmental
stimuli regulate CRE-mediated transcription within the nucleus accumbens shell,
and that changes in CREB activity within this brain area subsequently alter gating
between emotional stimuli and their behavioral responses. This control appears
to be independent of the intrinsic appetitive or aversive value of the stimulus.
The potential relevance of these data to addiction and mood disorders is discussed."
[Full Text]
| Helen Phillips
The pleasure seekers New Scientist, 11 October
2003 "At first glance, the "reward centre" idea seems hard to
fault. The self-stimulation experiments, beginning with rats in the 1950s and
followed by the human experiments in the 1960s, seemed perfectly clear. Modern
brain-imaging studies have confirmed that the centre works overtime whenever you're
enjoying something, whether it's sex or chocolate, drugs or music. And chemical
analysis shows that, whatever your pleasure, dopamine fuels the circuit. "Dopamine
was the pleasure transmitter," says Berridge. "The evidence seemed so
strong. If you shut down dopamine signalling by giving a drug that blocks dopamine
receptors, you dilute the reward value of everything." So why did he and
others begin to question the status quo? Berridge
reckons that his doubts began to creep in around the late 1980s, with a few surprise
results. He'd found that he could watch rats' facial expressions to judge their
reactions to certain tastes. Believe it or not, rats actually look pleased when
given sweet things to taste, and produce the rat equivalent of a disgusted look
in response to bitterness. The assumption was that these expressions were of pleasure
or displeasure, mediated by the reward centre. The surprise came when Berridge
blocked the dopamine signal with drugs. In theory, with dopamine knocked out there
was now no way for the rats to sense the reward value of the sweetness, so he
was expecting not to see any "pleased" expressions. But the rats seemed
just as expressive as ever. Putting it down to experimental
error, Berridge tried a more foolproof test. He used rats in which dopamine-producing
cells had been wiped out with a neurotoxin. It was already known that these animals
simply stopped eating. "They would voluntarily starve to death if the experimenter
didn't intervene and feed them," says Berridge. Researchers had always thought
that the rats' lack of dopamine meant they didn't like food. But when Berridge
force-fed them with sweet and bitter liquids, their facial reactions were normal.
"They still showed the proper positive face to sugar and the proper negative
face to quinine," he says. "It looked like their reaction to pleasure
was normal even though their dopamine was gone." What
was going on? The experiments prompted Berridge to look back at Heath's brain
electrode results. He was struck this time by what feelings the subjects reported.
They all said they felt good, and always pleaded for more when the controls were
taken away. But was it pleasure? The reports mentioned feelings of alertness,
warmth and goodwill, arousal, a desire to masturbate, or to drink even though
they weren't thirsty. It sounded more like desire than pleasure. This fitted perfectly
with Berridge's rats. Even with no activity in the reward area, they seemed to
"like" the taste of sweet food. They just didn't "want" it.
Could the dopamine system be a desire circuit that mediates our feelings of wanting
something, rather than a pleasure centre that supplies our feelings of liking? Although
it was Berridge who drew attention to the distinction between wanting and liking,
he is by no means the only researcher to realise that "pleasure" is
not quite the right term to attach to activity in the dopamine system. If people
are given drugs that block or stimulate dopamine release, it doesn't alter how
much they report liking certain tastes. What that suggests is that the dopamine
system itself doesn't produce feelings of pleasure, says Panksepp. "The dopamine
system is about motivation and seeking. It gives a generalised desire or urge,
an eagerness to engage with the world." Studies
of drug addiction add weight to the idea that the dopamine system is not about
pleasure but desire. Addicts always end up needing more of their drug to keep
the pleasure level steady. But they never say they develop a greater "liking"
for any drug - they just "want" it more and more. ..." [Full
Text]
Pecina S, Cagniard B, Berridge KC, Aldridge
JW, Zhuang X. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher "wanting"
but not "liking" for sweet rewards. J Neurosci.
2003 Oct 15;23(28):9395-402. "What is the role of dopamine in natural
rewards? A genetic mutant approach was taken to examine the consequences of elevated
synaptic dopamine on (1) spontaneous food and water intake, (2) incentive motivation
and learning to obtain a palatable sweet reward in a runway task, and (3) affective
"liking" reactions elicited by the taste of sucrose. A dopamine transporter
(DAT) knockdown mutation that preserves only 10% of normal DAT, and therefore
causes mutant mice to have 70% elevated levels of synaptic dopamine, was used
to identify dopamine effects on food intake and reward. We found that hyperdopaminergic
DAT knockdown mutant mice have higher food and water intake. In a runway task,
they demonstrated enhanced acquisition and greater incentive performance for a
sweet reward. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice leave the start box more quickly than
wild-type mice, require fewer trials to learn, pause less often in the runway,
resist distractions better, and proceed more directly to the goal. Those observations
suggest that hyperdopaminergic mutant mice attribute greater incentive salience
("wanting") to a sweet reward in the runway test. But sucrose taste
fails to elicit higher orofacial "liking" reactions from mutant mice
in an affective taste reactivity test. These results indicate that chronically
elevated extracellular dopamine facilitates "wanting" and learning of
an incentive motivation task for a sweet reward, but elevated dopamine does not
increase "liking" reactions to the hedonic impact of sweet tastes."
[Abstract] Zhang
M, Balmadrid C, Kelley AE. Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and
dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: contrasting effects revealed
by a progressive ratio study in the rat. Behav Neurosci.
2003 Apr;117(2):202-11. "The current studies were designed to evaluate
whether incentive motivation for palatable food is altered after manipulations
of opioid, GABAergic, and dopaminergic transmission within the nucleus accumbens.
A progressive ratio schedule was used to measure lever-pressing for sugar pellets
after microinfusion of drugs into the nucleus accumbens in non-food-deprived rats.
The mu opioid agonist D-Ala2, NMe-Phe4, Glyo15-enkephalin and the indirect dopamine
agonist amphetamine induced a marked increase in break point and correct lever-presses;
the GABA(A) agonist muscimol did not affect breakpoint or lever-presses. The data
suggest that opioid, dopaminergic, and GABAergic systems within the accumbens
differentially modulate food-seeking behavior through mechanisms related to hedonic
evaluation of food, incentive salience, and control of motor feeding circuits,
respectively." [Abstract]
Berridge
KC. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci
Biobehav Rev. 1996;20(1):1-25. "What are the neutral substrates of food
reward? Are reward and pleasure identical? Can taste pleasure be assessed in animals?
Is reward necessarily conscious? These questions have re-emerged in recent years,
and there is now sufficient evidence to prompt re-examination of many preconceptions
concerning reward and its relation to brain systems. This paper reviews evidence
from many sources regarding both the psychological structure of food reward and
the neutral systems that mediate it. Special attention is paid to recent evidence
from "tasty reactivity" studies of affective reactions to food. I argue
that this evidence suggests the following surprising possibilities regarding the
functional components and brain substrates of food reward. (1) Reward contains
distinguishable psychological or functional components--"liking" (pleasure/palatability)
and "wanting" (appetite/incentive motivation). These can be manipulated
and measured separately. (2) Liking and wanting have separable neutral substrates.
Mediation of liking related to food reward involves neurotransmitter systems such
as opioid and GABA/benzodiazepine systems, and anatomical structures such as ventral
pallidum and brainstem primary gustatory relays. Mediation of wanting related
to food reward involves mesotelencephalic dopamine systems, and divisions of nucleus
accumbens and amygdala. Both liking and wanting arise from vastly distributed
neutral systems, but the two systems are separable. (3) Neutral processing of
food reward is not confined to the limbic forebrain. Aspects of food reward begin
to be processed in the brainstem. A neutral manipulation can enhance reward or
produce aversion but no single lesion or transection is likely abolish all properties
of food reward. (4) Both wanting and liking can exist without subjective awareness.
Conscious experience can distort or blur the underlying reward process that gave
rise to it. Subjective reports may contain false assessments of underlying processes,
or even fail at all to register important reward processes. The core processes
of liking and wanting that constitute reward are distinct from the subjective
report or conscious awareness of those processes." [Abstract] Kelley
AE, Bakshi VP, Haber SN, Steininger TL, Will MJ, Zhang M. Opioid
modulation of taste hedonics within the ventral striatum. Physiol
Behav. 2002 Jul;76(3):365-77. "There is a long-standing interest in the
role of endogenous opioid peptides in feeding behavior and, in particular, in
the modulation of food reward and palatability. Since drugs such as heroin, morphine,
alcohol, and cannabinoids, interact with this system, there may be important common
neural substrates between food and drug reward with regard to the brain's opioid
systems. In this paper, we review the proposed functional role of opioid neurotransmission
and mu opiate receptors within the nucleus accumbens and surrounding ventral striatum.
Opioid compounds, particularly those selective for the mu receptor, induce a potent
increase in food intake, sucrose, salt, saccharin, and ethanol intake. We have
explored this phenomenon with regard to macronutrient selection, regional specificity,
role of output structures, Fos mapping, analysis of motivational state, and enkephalin
gene expression. We hypothesize that opioid-mediated mechanisms within ventral
striatal medium spiny neurons mediate the affective or hedonic response to food
('liking' or food 'pleasure'). A further refinement of this hypothesis is that
activation of ventral striatal opioids specifically encodes positive affect induced
by tasty and/or calorically dense foods (such as sugar and fat), and promotes
behaviors associated with this enhanced palatability. It is proposed that this
brain mechanism was beneficial in evolutionary development for ensuring the consumption
of relatively scarce, high-energy food sources. However, in modern times, with
unlimited supplies of high-calorie food, it has contributed to the present epidemic
of obesity." [Abstract]
Pecina S, Berridge KC. Opioid site
in nucleus accumbens shell mediates eating and hedonic 'liking' for food: map
based on microinjection Fos plumes. Brain Res. 2000 Apr
28;863(1-2):71-86. "Microinjection of opioid agonists, such as morphine,
into the nucleus accumbens shell produces increases in eating behavior (i.e. 'wanting'
for food). This study (1) reports direct evidence that activation of accumbens
opioid receptors in rats also augments food 'liking', or the hedonic impact of
taste, and (2) identified a neural site that definitely contains receptors capable
of increasing food intake. Morphine microinjections (0.5 microgram) into accumbens
shell, which caused rats to increase eating, were found also to cause selective
increases in positive hedonic patterns of behavioral affective reaction elicited
by oral sucrose, using the 'taste reactivity' test of hedonic palatability. This
positive shift indicated that morphine microinjections enhanced the hedonic impact
of food palatability. The accumbens site mediating morphine-induced increases
in food 'wanting' and 'liking' was identified using a novel method based on local
expression of Fos induced directly by drug microinjections. The plume-shaped region
of drug-induced increase in Fos immunoreactivity immediately surrounding a morphine
microinjection site (Fos plume) was objectively mapped. A point-sampling procedure
was used to measure the shape and size of 'positive' plumes of Fos expression
triggered by microinjections of morphine at locations that caused increases in
eating behavior. This revealed a functionally 'positive' neural region, containing
receptors directly activated by behaviorally-effective drug microinjections. A
subtraction mapping procedure was then used to eliminate all surrounding regions
containing any 'negative' Fos plumes that failed to increase food intake. The
subtraction produced a conservative map of the positive site, by eliminating regions
that gave mixed effects, and leaving only a positive region that must contain
receptors capable of mediating increases in food intake. The resulting mapped
'opioid eating site' was contained primarily within the medial caudal subregion
of the nucleus accumbens shell, and did not substantially penetrate either into
the accumbens core or into other subregions of the shell. Several other structures
outside the nucleus accumbens (such as rostral ventral pallidum), immediately
medial and adjacent to the shell, also appeared to be included in the functional
site. Opioid receptors within this site thus are capable of mediating morphine-induced
increases in eating, in part by enhancing the hedonic reward properties of food."
[Abstract]
Wyvell,
Cindy L., Berridge, Kent C. Intra-Accumbens Amphetamine Increases
the Conditioned Incentive Salience of Sucrose Reward: Enhancement of Reward "Wanting"
without Enhanced "Liking" or Response Reinforcement J.
Neurosci. 2000 20: 8122-8130 "Amphetamine microinjection into the nucleus
accumbens shell enhanced the ability of a Pavlovian reward cue to trigger increased
instrumental performance for sucrose reward in a pure conditioned incentive paradigm.
Rats were first trained to press one of two levers to obtain sucrose pellets.
They were separately conditioned to associate a Pavlovian cue (30 sec light) with
free sucrose pellets. On test days, the rats received bilateral microinjection
of intra-accumbens vehicle or amphetamine (0.0, 2.0, 10.0, or 20.0 microgram/0.5
microliter), and lever pressing was tested in the absence of any reinforcement
contingency, while the Pavlovian cue alone was freely presented at intervals throughout
the session. Amphetamine microinjection selectively potentiated the cue-elicited
increase in sucrose-associated lever pressing, although instrumental responding
was not reinforced by either sucrose or the cue during the test. Intra-accumbens
amphetamine can therefore potentiate cue-triggered incentive motivation for reward
in the absence of primary or secondary reinforcement. Using the taste reactivity
measure of hedonic impact, it was shown that intra-accumbens amphetamine failed
to increase positive hedonic reaction patterns elicited by sucrose (i.e., sucrose
"liking") at doses that effectively increase sucrose "wanting."
We conclude that nucleus accumbens dopamine specifically mediates the ability
of reward cues to trigger "wanting" (incentive salience) for their associated
rewards, independent of both hedonic impact and response reinforcement."
[Full Text] Kelley,
Ann E., Berridge, Kent C. The Neuroscience of Natural Rewards: Relevance
to Addictive Drugs J. Neurosci. 2002 22: 3306-3311 [Full
Text] Wolf, Marina E. Addiction:
Making the Connection Between Behavioral Changes and Neuronal Plasticity in Specific
Pathways Mol. Interv. 2002 2: 146-157 "There is
an emerging consensus that drug addiction is a form of maladaptive learning. Drugs
of abuse usurp the neuronal circuitry involved in motivation and reward, leading
to aberrant engagement of learning processes. As a result, drug-associated cues
can trigger craving and compulsive drug-seeking behavior, and voluntary control
over drug use is lost. Abused drugs can also modulate long-term potentiation (LTP)
and long-term depression (LTD) in neuronal circuits associated with the addiction
process, suggesting a way for the behavioral consequences of drug-taking to become
reinforced by learning mechanisms. This review will assess progress in correlating
these effects on LTP and LTD with behavioral changes in animal models of addiction,
particularly behavioral sensitization." [Full
Text]
El-Ghundi M, O'Dowd BF, Erclik M, George SR. Attenuation
of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice. Eur
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb;17(4):851-62. "Dopaminergic systems are thought to
mediate the rewarding and reinforcing effects of palatable food. However, the
relative contribution of different dopamine receptor subtypes is not clear. We
used dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice (D1 -/-) and their wild-type and heterozygous
littermates to study the role of the D1 receptor in palatable food reinforced
behaviour using operant responding and free access paradigms. Non-deprived mice
were trained to press a lever for sucrose pellets under three schedules of reinforcement
including fixed ratios (FR-1 and FR-4) and a progressive ratio (PR). Responding
on one lever was reinforced by the delivery of a sucrose pellet or solution while
responding on a second lever had no programmed consequences. Initially, D1 mutant
mice took longer to learn to discriminate between the two levers and had significantly
lower operant responding for sucrose pellets and solution than wild-type and heterozygous
mice under all schedules of reinforcement. Food deprivation enhanced responding
on the active lever in all mice although it remained significantly lower in D1
-/- mice than in control mice. Following extinction of sucrose reinforcement and
reversal of the levers, D1 -/- mice showed deficits in extinguishing and reversing
previously learned responses. Home cage intake and preference of sucrose pellets
and solutions when given under free-choice access paradigms were similar among
the groups. These results suggest that the dopamine D1 receptor plays a role in
the motivation to work for reward (palatable food) but not in reward perception
and is critical in learning new but relevant information and discontinuing previously
learned responses." [Abstract]
Robinson TE, Kolb B. Alterations in the morphology
of dendrites and dendritic spines in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex
following repeated treatment with amphetamine or cocaine.
Eur J Neurosci 1999 May;11(5):1598-604 "Repeated treatment with psychostimulant
drugs produces changes in brain and behaviour that far outlast their initial neuropharmacological
actions. The nature of persistent drug-induced neurobehavioural adaptations is
of interest because they are thought to contribute to the development of dependence
and addiction, and other forms of psychopathology, e.g. amphetamine psychosis.
There are many reports that psychostimulants produce biochemical adaptations in
brain monoamine systems, especially dopamine systems. The purpose of the present
study was to determine if they might also alter the morphology of neurons in brain
regions that receive monoaminergic innervation. Rats were given repeated injections
of either amphetamine or cocaine, or, to control for general motor activity, allowed
access to a running wheel. They were then left undisturbed for 24-25 days before
their brains were processed for Golgi-Cox staining. Treatment with either amphetamine
or cocaine (but not wheel running experience) increased the number of dendritic
branches and the density of dendritic spines on medium spiny neurons in the shell
of the nucleus accumbens, and on apical dendrites of layer V pyramidal cells in
the prefrontal cortex. Cocaine also increased dendritic branching and spine density
on the basilar dendrites of pyramidal cells. In addition, both drugs doubled the
incidence of branched spines on medium spiny neurons. It is suggested that some
of the persistent neurobehavioural consequences of repeated exposure to psychostimulant
drugs may be due to their ability to reorganize patterns of synaptic connectivity
in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex." [Abstract]
Cho J, Duke D, Manzino L, Sonsalla PK, West MO. Dopamine
depletion causes fragmented clustering of neurons in the sensorimotor striatum:
evidence of lasting reorganization of corticostriatal input. J
Comp Neurol. 2002 Oct 7;452(1):24-37. "Firing during sensorimotor exam
was used to categorize single neurons in the lateral striatum of awake, unrestrained
rats. Five rats received unilateral injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into
the medial forebrain bundle to deplete striatal dopamine (DA; >98% depletion,
postmortem assay). Three months after treatment, rats exhibited exaggerated rotational
behavior induced by L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) and contralateral sensory
neglect. Electrode track "depth profiles" on the DA-depleted side showed
fragmented clustering of neurons related to sensorimotor activity of single body
parts (SBP neurons). Clusters were smaller than normal, and more SBP neurons were
observed in isolation, outside of clusters. More body parts were represented per
unit volume. No recovery in these measures was observed up to one year post lesion.
Overall distributions of neurons related to different body parts were not altered.
The fragmentation of SBP clusters after DA depletion indicates that a percentage
of striatal SBP neurons switched responsiveness from one body part to one or more
different body parts. Because the specific firing that characterizes striatal
SBP neurons is mediated by corticostriatal inputs (Liles and Updyke [1985] Brain
Res. 339:245-255), the data indicate that DA depletion resulted in a reorganization
of corticostriatal connections, perhaps via unmasking or sprouting of connections
to adjacent clusters of striatal neurons. After reorganization, sensory activity
in a localized body part activates striatal neurons that have switched to that
body part. In turn, switched signals sent from basal ganglia to premotor and motor
neurons, which likely retain their original connections, would create mismatches
in these normally precise topographic connections. Switched signals could partially
explain parkinsonian deficits in motor functions involving somatosensory guidance
and their intractability to L-DOPA therapy-particularly if the switching involves
sprouting." [Abstract]
Rotzinger S, Bush DE, Vaccarino FJ. Cholecystokinin
modulation of mesolimbic dopamine function: regulation of motivated behaviour. Pharmacol
Toxicol. 2002 Dec;91(6):404-13. This article reviews evidence and presents
a hypothesis regarding the effects of stress on motivated behaviour, and in particular
the observation that stress can have both motivationally inhibitory and motivationally
facilitatory effects. This issue will be addressed with regard to psychostimulant
self-administration, and the role that the neurobiological mechanisms underlying
motivated behaviour are thought to be involved in the evolution of addictions.
Evidence from animal studies shows that stress and stress-related hormones such
as corticosterone can facilitate mesolimbic dopamine function and the behavioural
effects of psychostimulants, particularly at lower levels of stress. Conversely,
higher levels of stress can inhibit motivated behaviour, and evidence is presented
that this may occur in part through the effects of the neuropeptide cholecystokinin
(CCK), acting through CCK-B receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Individual differences
in endogenous CCK and dopamine systems are hypothesized to be important modulators
of individual differences in motivated behaviour. [Abstract]
|