|
Barrett TB, Hauger RL, Kennedy
JL, Sadovnick AD, Remick RA, Keck PE, McElroy SL, Alexander M, Shaw SH, Kelsoe
JR. Evidence that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter
of the G protein receptor kinase 3 gene is associated with bipolar disorder. Mol
Psychiatry. 2003 May;8(5):546-57. "In a genome-wide linkage survey, we
have previously shown evidence suggesting that the chromosome 22q12 region contains
a susceptibility locus for bipolar disorder (BPD). Two independent family sets
yielded lod scores suggestive of linkage at markers in this region near the gene
G protein receptor kinase 3 (GRK3). GRK3 is an excellent candidate risk gene for
BPD since GRK3 is expressed widely in the brain, and since GRKs play key roles
in the homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. We
have also previously shown GRK3 expression to be induced by amphetamine in an
animal model of mania using microarray-based expression profiling. To identify
possible functional mutations in GRK3, we sequenced the putative promoter region,
all 21 exons, and intronic sequence flanking each exon, in 14-22 individuals with
BPD. We found six sequence variants in the 5'-UTR/promoter region, but no coding
or obvious splice variants. Transmission disequilibrium analyses of one set of
153 families indicated that two of the 5'-UTR/promoter variants are associated
with BPD in families of northern European Caucasian ancestry. A supportive trend
towards association to one of these two variants (P-5) was then subsequently obtained
in an independent sample of 237 families. In the combined sample, the P-5 variant
had an estimated allele frequency of 3% in bipolar subjects, and displayed a transmission
to non-transmission ratio of 26 : 7.7 (chi(2)=9.6, one-sided P value=0.0019).
Altogether, these data support the hypothesis that a dysregulation in GRK3 expression
alters signaling desensitization, and thereby predisposes to the development of
BPD." [Abstract] ALEXANDER
B. NICULESCU, III, DAVID S. SEGAL, RONALD KUCZENSKI, THOMAS BARRETT, RICHARD L.
HAUGER, and JOHN R. KELSOE Identifying a series of candidate genes
for mania and psychosis: a convergent functional genomics approach Physiol.
Genomics 4: 83-91, 2000. "We have used methamphetamine treatment of rats
as an animal model for psychotic mania. Specific brain regions were analyzed comprehensively
for changes in gene expression using oligonucleotide GeneChip microarrays. The
data was cross-matched against human genomic loci associated with either bipolar
disorder or schizophrenia. Using this convergent approach, we have identified
several novel candidate genes (e.g., signal transduction molecules, transcription
factors, metabolic enzymes) that may be involved in the pathogenesis of mood disorders
and psychosis. Furthermore, for one of these genes, G protein-coupled receptor
kinase 3 (GRK3), we found by Western blot analysis evidence for decreased protein
levels in a subset of patient lymphoblastoid cell lines that correlated with disease
severity. Finally, the classification of these candidate genes into two prototypical
categories, psychogenes and psychosis-suppressor genes, is described. ... G
protein-coupled receptor kinase 3. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (GRK3)
mediates homologous desensitization for a variety of neurotransmitters by phosphorylation
of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GRK3 maps to human chromosome 22q11. This
region had been previously implicated in bipolar disorder by our group (32, 38)
and others (11, 15). In fact, 22q yielded the highest LOD scores of any chromosomal
region in our genome survey (results to be reported separately). Consistent with
many findings in this field, this linkage peak was broad and spanned nearly 20
cM. One of the highest LOD scores in this region was 2.2 at D22S419, which maps
to within 40 kb of GRK3. This marker is also quite close to the markers identified
in the two other independent positive linkage reports for 22q in bipolar disorder.
A marker within the GRK3 gene, D22S315, has also been implicated in a study of
eye tracking and evoked potential abnormalities in schizophrenia (44). The
known physiological role of GRK3, described in more detail below, suggests the
hypothesis that a defect in its function could lead to supersensitivity to dopamine
or a defect in the homeostatic adaptation to dopamine, which in turn could predispose
to illness." [Full
Text] Potash JB, Zandi PP, Willour VL, Lan TH,
Huo Y, Avramopoulos D, Shugart YY, MacKinnon DF, Simpson SG, McMahon FJ, DePaulo
JR Jr, McInnis MG. Suggestive linkage to chromosomal regions 13q31
and 22q12 in families with psychotic bipolar disorder. Am
J Psychiatry 2003 Apr;160(4):680-6 "OBJECTIVE: Linkage studies of bipolar
disorder and schizophrenia have found overlapping evidence for susceptibility
genes in four chromosomal regions-10p12-14, 13q32, 18p11.2, and 22q12-13. The
authors previously demonstrated familial clustering of psychotic symptoms-defined
as hallucinations and/or delusions-in some bipolar disorder pedigrees. In this
study they used stratified linkage analysis to test the hypothesis that those
bipolar disorder pedigrees most enriched for psychotic symptoms would show greater
evidence of linkage to the regions of previous bipolar disorder/schizophrenia
linkage overlap. METHOD: Nonparametric linkage analyses using GENEHUNTER and ASPEX
were performed on 65 bipolar disorder families. Family subsets were defined by
the number of family members with psychotic mood disorder. RESULTS: The 10 families
in which three or more members had psychotic mood disorder showed suggestive evidence
of linkage to 13q31 (nonparametric linkage score=3.56; LOD score=2.52) and 22q12
(nonparametric linkage score=3.32; LOD score=3.06). These results differed significantly
from those for the entire study group of 65 families, which showed little or no
linkage evidence in the two regions. The 10 families with three or more psychotic
members did not show evidence of linkage to 10p12-14 or 18p11.2. The 95% confidence
interval on 22q12 spanned 4.3 centimorgans (2.6 megabases) and was congruent with
previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar disorder families in which psychotic symptoms
cluster may carry susceptibility genes on chromosomal regions 13q31 and 22q12.
Replication should be attempted in similar families and perhaps in schizophrenia
families in which mood symptoms cluster because these overlapping phenotypes may
correlate most closely with the putative susceptibility genes. The localization
of the 22q12 finding particularly encourages further study of this region."
[Abstract]
Shubhik
K. DebBurman, Judy Ptasienski, Evan Boetticher, Jon W. Lomasney, Jeffrey L. Benovic,
and M. Marlene Hosey Lipid-mediated Regulation of G Protein-coupled
Receptor Kinases 2 and 3 J. Biol. Chem. 270: 5742-5747,
1995. "G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling is attenuated by
a process referred to as desensitization, wherein agonist-dependent phosphorylation
of receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) is proposed to be a
key initial event. However, mechanisms that activate GRKs are not fully understood.
In one scenario, beta gamma-subunits of G proteins (G beta gamma) activate certain
GRKs (beta-adrenergic receptor kinases 1 and 2, or GRK2 and GRK3), via a pleckstrin
homology domain in the COOH terminus. This interaction has been proposed to translocate
cytosolic beta-adrenergic receptor kinases (beta ARKs) to the plasma membrane
and facilitate interaction with receptor substrates. Here, we report a novel finding
that membrane lipids modulate beta ARK activity in vitro in a manner that is analogous
and competitive with G beta gamma. Several lipids, including phosphatidylserine
(PS), stimulated, whereas phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate inhibited, the
ability of these GRKs to phosphorylate agonist-occupied m2 muscarinic acetylcholine
receptors. Furthermore, both PS and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate specifically
bound to beta ARK1, whereas phosphatidylcholine, a lipid that did not modulate
beta ARK activity, did not bind to beta ARK1. The lipid regulation of beta ARKs
did not occur via a modulation of its autophosphorylation state. PS- and G beta
gamma-mediated stimulation of beta ARK1 was compared and found strikingly similar;
moreover, their effects together were not additive (except at initial stages of
reaction), which suggests that PS and G beta gamma employed a common interaction
and activation mechanism with the kinase. The effects of these lipids were prevented
by two well known G beta gamma-binding proteins, phosducin and GST-beta ARK-(466-689)
fusion protein, suggesting that the G beta gamma-binding domain (possibly the
pleckstrin homology domain) of the GRKs is also a site for lipid:protein interaction.
We submit the intriguing possibility that both lipids and G proteins co-regulate
the function of GRKs." [Full
Text]
James J. Onorato, Mary E. Gillis, Yu Liu,
Jeffrey L. Benovic, and Arnold E. Ruoho The beta-Adrenergic Receptor
Kinase (GRK2) Is Regulated by Phospholipids J. Biol. Chem.
270: 21346-21353, 1995. "The beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK)
is a member of growing family of G protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). beta
ARK and other members of the GRK family play a role in the mechanism of agonist-specific
desensitization by virtue of their ability to phosphorylate G protein-coupled
receptors in an agonist-dependent manner. beta ARK activation is known to occur
following the interaction of the kinase with the agonist-occupied form of the
receptor substrate and heterotrimeric G protein beta gamma subunits. Recently,
lipid regulation of GRK2, GRK3, and GRK5 have also been described. Using a mixed
micelle assay, GRK2 (beta ARK1) was found to require phospholipid in order to
phosphorylate the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. As determined with a nonreceptor
peptide substrate of beta ARK, catalytic activity of the kinase increased in the
presence of phospholipid without a change in the Km for the peptide. Data obtained
with the heterobifunctional cross-linking agent N-3-[125I]iodo-4-azidophenylpropionamido-S-(2-thiopyridyl)-c
ysteine ([125I]ACTP) suggests that the activation by phospholipid was associated
with a conformational change in the kinase. [125I]ACTP incorporation increased
2-fold in the presence of crude phosphatidylcholine, and this increase in [125I]ACTP
labeling is completely blocked by the addition of MgATP. Furthermore, proteolytic
mapping was consistent with the modification of a distinct site when GRK2 was
labeled in the presence of phospholipid. While an acidic phospholipid specificity
was demonstrated using the mixed micelle phosphorylation assay, a notable exception
was observed with PIP2. In the presence of PIP2, kinase activity as well as [125I]ACTP
labeling was inhibited. These data demonstrate the direct regulation of GRK2 activity
by phospholipids and supports the hypothesis that this effect is the result of
a conformational change within the kinase." [Full
Text] On site link: PIP2 and lithium
Christopher
V. Carman, Jean-Luc Parent, Peter W. Day, Alexey N. Pronin, Pamela M. Sternweis,
Philip B. Wedegaertner, Alfred G. Gilman, Jeffrey L. Benovic, and Tohru Kozasa
Selective Regulation of Gq/11 by an RGS Domain in the G Protein-coupled
Receptor Kinase, GRK2 J. Biol. Chem. 274: 34483-34492,
1999. "G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized
regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling
(RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein alpha subunits. Interestingly,
a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers,
M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of
GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate
AlF(4)(-)-dependent binding to G protein alpha subunits, we tested the ability
of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns
in the absence or presence of AlF(4)(-). This revealed the specific ability of
bovine brain Galpha(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF(4)(-)-dependent
manner. In contrast, Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(12/13) did not bind to GRK2
or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that
bovine brain Galpha(q/11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2,
while no binding of Galpha(q/11), Galpha(s), Galpha(i), or Galpha(12/13) to comparable
constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Galpha(q)
revealed significant binding of both Galpha(q) GDP/AlF(4)(-) and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS),
but not Galpha(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed
in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively
active Galpha(q)(R183C) but not wild type Galpha(q). In vitro analysis revealed
that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Galpha(q) that is dependent on the
presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited
Galpha(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta both in vitro and in cells,
possibly through sequestration of activated Galpha(q). These data suggest that
a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor
signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins." [Full
Text]
Willets, Jonathon M., Challiss, R. A. John,
Kelly, Eamonn, Nahorski, Stefan R. G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases
3 and 6 Use Different Pathways to Desensitize the Endogenous M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine
Receptor in Human SH-SY5Y Cells Mol Pharmacol 2001 60: 321-330 "We
have investigated the effects of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 3 and
GRK6 on the phosphorylation and regulation of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine
receptor (mACh) endogenously expressed in SH-SY5Y cells. Overexpression of GRK3
or GRK6 enhanced M3 mACh receptor phosphorylation after high-concentration methacholine
(100 microM, 1 min) addition. However, GRK6 was more potent, increasing receptor
phosphorylation even after low (3 microM, 1 min) agonist stimulation. Compared
with plasmid-transfected control cells expressing equivalent M3 mACh receptor
number, GRK3- or GRK6-overexpressing cells exhibited a reduced phospholipase C
activity reflected by a lower accumulation of total [3H]inositol phosphates and
Ins(1,4,5)P3 mass. In addition, direct stimulation of G protein activation of
phospholipase C (by AlF4(-)) was inhibited in GRK3- but not GRK6-overexpressing
cells. Guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding and immunoprecipitation
of Galpha(q/11) indicated that acute methacholine-stimulated receptor/Galpha(q/11)
coupling was unaffected by GRK overexpression. In contrast, agonist pretreatment
of cells for 3 min caused M3 mACh receptor uncoupling from Galpha(q/11), which
was markedly enhanced by GRK6 overexpression, particularly at lower agonist pretreatment
concentrations. However, the increased M3 mACh receptor phosphorylation seen in
clones overexpressing GRK3 was not accompanied by increased receptor-Galpha(q/11)
uncoupling. Overall, these data suggest that GRK3 and GRK6 use different pathways
to desensitize the M3 mACh receptor. GRK6 seems to act as a classical GRK, inducing
increased receptor phosphorylation accompanied by an uncoupling of receptor and
Galpha(q/11). Conversely, GRK3 may cause desensitization independently of receptor
phosphorylation, possibly via Gbetagamma binding and/or direct Galpha(q) binding
via its regulator of G protein signaling domain to inhibit phospholipase C activity."
[Full Text] Yehia
Daaka, Julie A. Pitcher, Mark Richardson, Robert H. Stoffel, Janet D. Robishaw,
and Robert J. Lefkowitz Receptor and G betagamma isoform-specific
interactions with G protein-coupled receptor kinases PNAS
94: 2180-2185, 1997. "The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs)
phosphorylate and desensitize agonist-occupied GPCRs. GRK2-mediated receptor phosphorylation
is preceded by the agonist-dependent membrane association of this enzyme. Previous
in vitro studies with purified proteins have suggested that this translocation
may be mediated by the recruitment of GRK2 to the plasma membrane by its interaction
with the free betagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins (G betagamma). Here
we demonstrate that this mechanism operates in intact cells and that specificity
is imparted by the selective interaction of discrete pools of G betagamma with
receptors and GRKs. Treatment of Cos-7 cells transiently overexpressing GRK2 with
a beta-receptor agonist promotes a 3-fold increase in plasma membrane-associated
GRK2. This translocation of GRK2 is inhibited by the carboxyl terminus of GRK2,
a known G betagamma sequestrant. Furthermore, in cells overexpressing both GRK2
and G beta1 gamma2, activation of lysophosphatidic acid receptors leads to the
rapid and transient formation of a GRK/G betagamma complex. That G betagamma specificity
exists at the level of the GPCR and the GRK is indicated by the observation that
a GRK2/G betagamma complex is formed after agonist occupancy of the lysophosphatidic
acid and beta-adrenergic but not thrombin receptors. In contrast to GRK2, GRK3
forms a G betagamma complex after stimulation of all three GPCRs. This G betagamma
binding specificity of the GRKs is also reflected at the level of the purified
proteins. Thus the GRK2 carboxyl terminus binds G beta1 and G beta2 but not G
beta3, while the GRK3 fusion protein binds all three G beta isoforms. This study
provides a direct demonstration of a role for G betagamma in mediating the agonist-stimulated
translocation of GRK2 and GRK3 in an intact cellular system and demonstrates isoform
specificity in the interaction of these components." [Full
Text]
Tsu Tshen Chuang, Lina Paolucci, and
Antonio De Blasi Inhibition of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase
Subtypes by Ca2+/Calmodulin J. Biol. Chem. 271: 28691-28696,
1996. "G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are implicated in the
homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. Six GRK subtypes have
so far been identified, named GRK1 to GRK6. The functional state of the GRKs can
be actively regulated in different ways. In particular, it was found that retinal
rhodopsin kinase (GRK1), but not the ubiquitous betaARK1 (GRK2), can be inhibited
by the photoreceptor-specific Ca2+-binding protein recoverin through direct binding.
The present study was aimed to investigate regulation of other GRKs by alternative
Ca2+-binding proteins such as calmodulin (CaM). We found that Gbetagamma-activated
GRK2 and GRK3 were inhibited by CaM to similar extents (IC50 approximately 2 microM),
while a 50-fold more potent inhibitory effect was observed on GRK5 (IC50 = 40
nM). Inhibition by CaM was strictly dependent on Ca2+ and was prevented by the
CaM inhibitor CaMBd. Since Gbetagamma, which is a binding target of Ca2+/CaM,
is critical for the activation of GRK2 and GRK3, it provides a possible site of
interaction between these proteins. However, since GRK5 is Gbetagamma-independent,
an alternative mechanism is conceivable. A direct interaction between GRK5 and
Ca2+/CaM was revealed using CaM-conjugated Sepharose 4B. This binding does not
influence the catalytic activity as demonstrated using the soluble GRK substrate
casein. Instead, Ca2+/CaM significantly reduced GRK5 binding to the membrane.
The mechanism of GRK5 inhibition appeared to be through direct binding to Ca2+/CaM,
resulting in inhibition of membrane association and hence receptor phosphorylation.
The present study provides the first evidence for a regulatory effect of Ca2+/CaM
on some GRK subtypes, thus expanding the range of different mechanisms regulating
the functional states of these kinases." [Full
Text] | Erdtmann-Vourliotis
M, Mayer P, Ammon S, Riechert U, Hollt V. Distribution of G-protein-coupled
receptor kinase (GRK) isoforms 2, 3, 5 and 6 mRNA in the rat brain. Brain
Res Mol Brain Res. 2001 Nov 1;95(1-2):129-37. "There is limited knowledge
about the distribution of the different G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs)
in the rat brain, especially for the recently cloned isoforms GRK5 and GRK6. In
this work an overview will be given of the mRNA expression patterns of four G-protein-coupled
receptor kinases, GRK2 (betaARK1), GRK3 (betaARK2), GRK5 and GRK6 in the rat brain.
As now shown by us and recently by others GRK2 and GRK3 are widely distributed
in rat brain with nearly the same expression pattern. But GRK3, in general, appeared
to be weaker expressed than GRK2 in most brain areas. Exceptions were the islands
of Calleja, the compact part of the substantia nigra and the locus coeruleus.
GRK3 mRNA was very low expressed or absent in the striatum and in some hypothalamic
and thalamic nuclei. The expression pattern of GRK6 was also similar to GRK2.
In the caudate putamen GRK6 yielded the strongest hybridization signal of all
GRK types. GRK5 took a special position. The message for this form was not expressed
ubiquitously in the brain but was mainly localized in limbic brain regions with
a very prominent expression in the lateral septal area. GRK5 may therefore be
involved in reward and addiction. Accordingly, a higher expression level of GRK5
mRNA was found in the lateral septum of cocaine-sensitized rats as compared to
controls." [Abstract]
Frank M. Dautzenberg, Sandra Braun, and Richard
L. Hauger GRK3 mediates desensitization of CRF1 receptors: a potential
mechanism regulating stress adaptation Am J Physiol Regul
Integr Comp Physiol 280: R935-R946, 2001. "Potential G protein-coupled
receptor kinase (GRK) and protein kinase A (PKA) mediation of homologous desensitization
of corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF1) receptors was investigated in
human retinoblastoma Y-79 cells. Inhibition of PKA activity by PKI(5-22) or H-89
failed to attenuate homologous desensitization of CRF1 receptors, and direct activation
of PKA by forskolin or dibutyryl cAMP failed to desensitize CRF-induced cAMP accumulation.
However, treatment of permeabilized Y-79 cells with heparin, a nonselective GRK
inhibitor, reduced homologous desensitization of CRF1 receptors by approximately
35%. Furthermore, Y-79 cell uptake of a GRK3 antisense oligonucleotide (ODN),
but not of a random or mismatched ODN, reduced GRK3 mRNA expression by approximately
50% without altering GRK2 mRNA expression and inhibited homologous desensitization
of CRF1 receptors by approximately 55%. Finally, Y-79 cells transfected with a
GRK3 antisense cDNA construct exhibited an approximately 50% reduction in GRK3
protein expression and an ~65% reduction in homologous desensitization of CRF1
receptors. We conclude that GRK3 contributes importantly to the homologous desensitization
of CRF1 receptors in Y-79 cells, a brain-derived cell line." [Full
Text] Dautzenberg FM, Wille S, Braun S, Hauger
RL. GRK3 regulation during CRF- and urocortin-induced CRF1 receptor
desensitization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Nov 1;298(3):303-8. "The
EC(50) values for concentration-dependent stimulation of cAMP accumulation by
CRF (1.3nM) and urocortin (1.0nM) were equivalent in human retinoblastoma Y79
cells. The time course and magnitude of CRF- and urocortin-induced CRF(1) receptor
desensitization were similar. A significant 3-fold increase in GRK3, but not GRK2,
mRNA levels accompanied the emergence of CRF(1) receptor desensitization in Y79
cells exposed to CRF. In preliminary experiments, retinoblastoma GRK3 protein
expression became upregulated during a 48-h CRF exposure. Neither GRK3 nor GRK2
expression increased in Y79 cells exposed to urocortin for 10 min to 48 h. We
hypothesize that GRK3 upregulation may be a cellular negative feedback process
directed at maximizing CRF(1) receptor desensitization by heightening GRK3 phosphorylating
capacity during prolonged exposure to high CRF. Regulation of GRK expression associated
with urocortin- and CRF-induced CRF(1) receptor desensitization appears to differ,
despite a similar level of signaling via the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway."
[Abstract]
Bawa
T, Altememi GF, Eikenburg DC, Standifer KM. Desensitization of alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor
signalling by modest levels of adrenaline is facilitated by beta(2)-adrenoceptor-dependent
GRK3 up-regulation. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;138(5):921-31. "1
Adrenaline (ADR) and noradrenaline (NA) can simultaneously activate inhibitory
alpha(2)- and stimulatory beta-adrenoceptors (AR). However, ADR and NA differ
significantly in that ADR is a potent beta(2)-AR agonist while NA is not. Only
recently has the interaction resulting from the simultaneous activation of alpha(2)-
and beta(2)-AR been examined at the cellular level to determine the mechanisms
of alpha(2)-AR regulation following concomitant activation of both alpha(2)- and
beta(2)-ARs by chronic ADR. 2 This study evaluates beta(2)-AR regulation of alpha(2A)-AR
signalling following chronic ADR (300 nM) and NA (1 and 30 micro M) treatments
of BE(2)-C human neuroblastoma cells that natively express both beta(2)- and alpha(2A)-ARs.
3 Chronic (24 h) treatment with ADR (300 nM) desensitized the response to the
alpha(2A)-AR agonist, brimonidine, in BE(2)-C cells. Addition of the beta-AR antagonist,
propranolol, blocked the ADR-induced alpha(2A)-AR desensitization. Unlike ADR,
chronic NA (1 micro M) treatment had no effect on the alpha(2A)-AR response. However
if NA was increased to 30 micro M for 24 h, alpha(2A)-AR desensitization was observed;
this desensitization was partially reversed by propranolol. 4 Chronic ADR (300
nM) treatment reduced alpha(2A)-AR binding levels, contributing to the alpha(2A)-AR
desensitization. This decrease was prevented by addition of propranolol during
ADR treatment. Chronic NA (30 micro M), like ADR, treatment lowered specific binding,
whereas 1 micro M NA treatment was without effect. 5 Chronic ADR treatment produced
a significant increase in GRK3 levels and this was blocked by propranolol or GRK2/3
antisense DNA treatment. This antisense DNA, common to both GRK2 and GRK3, also
blocked chronic ADR-induced alpha(2A)-AR desensitization and down-regulation.
6 Acute (1 h) ADR (300 nM) or NA treatment (1 micro M) produced alpha(2A)-AR desensitization.
The desensitization produced by acute treatment was beta-AR independent, as it
was not blocked by propranolol. 7 We conclude that chronic treatment with modest
levels of ADR produces alpha(2A)-AR desensitization by mechanisms that involve
up-regulation of GRK3 and down-regulation of alpha(2A)-AR levels through interactions
with the beta(2)-AR." [Abstract] Diviani
D, Lattion AL, Larbi N, Kunapuli P, Pronin A, Benovic JL, Cotecchia S. Effect
of different G protein-coupled receptor kinases on phosphorylation and desensitization
of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar
1;271(9):5049-58. "The alpha1B-adrenergic receptor (alpha1BAR), its truncated
mutant T368, different G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestin proteins
were transiently expressed in COS-7 or HEK293 cells alone and/or in various combinations.
Coexpression of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (betaARK) 1 (GRK2) or 2 (GRK3)
could increase epinephrine-induced phosphorylation of the wild type alpha1BAR
above basal as compared to that of the receptor expressed alone. On the other
hand, overexpression of the dominant negative betaARK (K220R) mutant impaired
agonist-induced phosphorylation of the receptor. Overexpression of GRK6 could
also increase epinephrine-induced phosphorylation of the receptor, whereas GRK5
enhanced basal but not agonist-induced phosphorylation of the alpha1BAR. Increasing
coexpression of betaARK1 or betaARK2 resulted in the progressive attenuation of
the alpha1BAR-mediated response on polyphosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis. However,
coexpression of betaARK1 or 2 at low levels did not significantly impair the PI
response mediated by the truncated alpha1BAR mutant T368, lacking the C terminus,
which is involved in agonist-induced desensitization and phosphorylation of the
receptor. Similar attenuation of the receptor-mediated PI response was also observed
for the wild type alpha1BAR, but not for its truncated mutant, when the receptor
was coexpressed with beta-arrestin 1 or beta-arrestin 2. Despite their pronounced
effect on phosphorylation of the alpha1BAR, overexpression of GRK5 or GRK6 did
not affect the receptor-mediated response. In conclusion, our results provide
the first evidence that betaARK1 and 2 as well as arrestin proteins might be involved
in agonist-induced regulation of the alpha1BAR. They also identify the alpha1BAR
as a potential phosphorylation substrate of GRK5 and GRK6. However, the physiological
implications of GRK5- and GRK6-mediated phosphorylation of the alpha1BAR remain
to be elucidated." [Full
Text] Mario Tiberi, S. Russel Nash, Lucie Bertrand,
Robert J. Lefkowitz, and Marc G. Caron Differential Regulation of
Dopamine D1A Receptor Responsiveness by Various G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases
J. Biol. Chem. 271: 3771-3778, 1996. "The role
of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in the regulation of dopamine D1A
receptor responsiveness is poorly understood. To explore the potential role played
by the GRKs in the regulation of the rat dopamine D1A receptor, we performed whole
cell phosphorylation experiments and cAMP assays in 293 cells cotransfected with
the receptor alone or with various GRKs (GRK2, GRK3, and GRK5). The agonist-dependent
phosphorylation of the rat D1A receptor was substantially increased in cells overexpressing
GRK2, GRK3, or GRK5. Moreover, we report that cAMP formation upon receptor activation
was differentially regulated in cells overexpressing either GRK2, GRK3, and GRK5
under conditions that elicited similar levels of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation.
Cells expressing the rat D1A receptor with GRK2 and GRK3 displayed a rightward
shift of the dopamine dose-response curve with little effect on the maximal activation
when compared with cells expressing the receptor alone. In contrast, cells expressing
GRK5 displayed a rightward shift in the EC50 value with an additional 40% reduction
in the maximal activation when compared with cells expressing the receptor alone.
Thus, we show that the dopamine D1A receptor can serve as a substrate for various
GRKs and that GRK-phosphorylated D1A receptors display a differential reduction
of functional coupling to adenylyl cyclase. These results suggest that the cellular
complement of G protein-coupled receptor kinases may determine the properties
and extent of agonist-mediated responsiveness and desensitization." [Full
Text]
Janet D. Lowe, Jeremy P. Celver, Vsevolod
V. Gurevich, and Charles Chavkin mu-Opioid Receptors Desensitize
Less Rapidly than delta-Opioid Receptors Due to Less Efficient Activation of Arrestin
J. Biol. Chem. 277: 15729-15735. "Receptor desensitization
by G-protein receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestins is likely to be an important
component underlying the development of tolerance to opioid drugs. Reconstitution
of this process in Xenopus oocytes revealed distinct differences in the kinetics
of GRK and arrestin regulation of the closely related opioid receptors mu (MOR),
delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR). We demonstrated that under identical conditions,
GRK and arrestin-dependent desensitization of MOR proceeds dramatically slower
than that of DOR. Furthermore, GRK3 phosphorylation sites required for opioid
receptor desensitization also greatly differ. The determinants for DOR and KOR
desensitization reside in the carboxyl-terminal tail, whereas MOR depends on Thr-180
in the second intracellular loop. Although this later finding might indicate an
inefficient phosphorylation of MOR Thr-180, increasing the amount of arrestin
expressed greatly increased the rate of MOR desensitization to a rate comparable
with that of DOR. Similarly, coexpression of a constitutively active arrestin
2(R169E) with MOR and DOR desensitized both receptors in an agonist-dependent,
GRK-independent manner at rates that were indistinguishable. Together, these data
suggest that it is the activation of arrestin, rather than its binding, that is
the rate-limiting step in MOR desensitization. In addition, mutation of Thr-161
in DOR, homologous to MOR Thr-180, significantly inhibited the faster desensitization
of DOR. These results suggest that DOR desensitization involves phosphorylation
of both the carboxyl-terminal tail and the second intracellular loop that together
leads to a more efficient activation of arrestin and thus faster desensitization."
[Full Text] Kovoor,
Abraham, Celver, Jeremy P., Wu, Albert, Chavkin, Charles Agonist
Induced Homologous Desensitization of µ-Opioid Receptors Mediated by G Protein-Coupled
Receptor Kinases Is Dependent on Agonist Efficacy Mol Pharmacol
1998 54: 704-711 "Using Xenopus laevis oocytes coexpressing mammalian
mu-opioid receptors (MORs), beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 (beta-ARK2) [also
called G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK3)], and beta-arrestin 2 (beta-arr
2), we compared the rates of beta-ARK2 (GRK3)- and beta-arr 2-mediated homologous
receptor desensitization produced by treatment with opioid agonists of different
efficacies. The response to MOR activation was measured using two-electrode voltage
clamp as an increase in the conductance of the coexpressed G protein-coupled inwardly
rectifying potassium (heteromultimer of KIR3.1 and KIR3.4) channels. Treatment
with opioids of high efficacy, either [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin, fentanyl,
or sufentanyl, produced a GRK3- and beta-arr 2-dependent reduction in response
in <20 min, whereas treatment with the partial agonist morphine produced receptor
desensitization at a significantly slower rate. Because GRK3 requires activation
and membrane targeting by free G protein betagamma subunits released after agonist-mediated
activation of G proteins, a low efficacy agonist such as morphine may produce
weak receptor desensitization as a consequence of poor GRK3 activation. To address
this hypothesis, we substituted GRK5, a GRK that does not require activation by
G protein betagamma. In oocytes expressing GRK5 instead of GRK3, both [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,
Gly-ol5]enkephalin and fentanyl, but not morphine, produced desensitization of
MOR-activated potassium conductance. Thus, mu-opioid agonists produced significant
receptor desensitization, mediated by either GRK3 or GRK5, at a rate dependent
on agonist efficacy." [Full
Text]
Jin, Wenzhen, Brown, Sean, Roche, John
P., Hsieh, Candace, Celver, Jeremy P., Kovoor, Abraham, Chavkin, Charles, Mackie,
Ken Distinct Domains of the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Mediate Desensitization
and Internalization J. Neurosci. 1999 19: 3773-3780 "Desensitization
of cannabinoid receptor signaling by a G-protein coupled receptor kinase (GRK)
was examined using the Xenopus oocyte expression system. Application of a CB1
agonist, WIN 55,212-2, evoked a concentration-dependent increase in K+ conductance
(Kir3) in oocytes coexpressing rat CB1 with the G-protein-gated, inwardly rectifying
K+ channels Kir3.1 and Kir3.4. Desensitization was slight during continuous agonist
application in the absence of GRK and arrestin. However, coexpression of GRK3
and beta-arrestin 2 (beta-arr2) caused profound homologous CB1 receptor desensitization,
supporting the hypothesis that GRK3 and beta-arr2 effectively produce CB1 receptor
desensitization. To identify the regions of the CB1 receptor responsible for GRK3-
and beta-arr2-mediated desensitization, we constructed several CB1 receptor mutants.
Truncation of the C-terminal tail of CB1 receptor at residue 418 (Delta418) almost
completely abolished desensitization but did not affect agonist activation of
Kir3. In contrast, truncation at residues 439 and 460 did not significantly affect
GRK3- and beta-arr2-dependent desensitization. A deletion mutant (Delta418-439)
did not desensitize, indicating that residues within this region are important
for GRK3- and beta-arr2-mediated desensitization. Phosphorylation in this region
was likely involved in desensitization, because mutation of either of two putative
phosphorylation sites (S426A or S430A) significantly attenuated desensitization.
CB1 receptors rapidly internalize after activation by agonist. Phosphorylation
of S426 or S430 was not necessary for internalization, because the S426A/S430A
CB1 mutant internalized when stably expressed in AtT20 cells. These studies establish
that CB1 desensitization can be regulated by a GRK and that different receptor
domains are involved in GRK- and beta-arrestin-dependent desensitization and CB1
internalization." [Full
Text]
|